Peer Tutoring With Simulations in Undergraduate Medical Students to Teach Basic Life Support: A Randomized Controlled Educational Trial

Afshan H Khattak, Farhat R Malik, Murtaza Rehman Khan, Khadija Noor, Fatima Noor, Jalwa Javed Farooqi, Owais Mudassir, Fariha Ali Khan, Zayed Naser

Abstract


ntroduction: Basic Life Support (BLS) is an important part of health care training conducted in small and interactive group format; however, hiring BLS instructors is costly. Peer tuition is an old technique, now being formalized to teach BLS. Role of junior peer tutors is not reported in the literature.

Materials & Methods: A single blind, randomized controlled educational trial to measure tutee performance after peer tuition versus conventional tuition in BLS was undertaken at Peshawar Medical College from December 2016 to March 2017. Pre-clinical students were trained as peer tutors. Students from all MBBS years were voluntarily enrolled in a course of BLS; 177 students were randomized into experimental, (n=87, peer tutors) and control, (n=90, conventional teaching). Pre and post-test, knowledge and skill scores were recorded for each group. SPSS Version 21 was used for descriptive statistics; paired samples t-test was applied to detect significant differences in performance, keeping p≤0.05 as significant.

Results: Pre-test scores were not significantly different between groups. Test group showed significant improvement in post-test scores over pre-test scores for both clinical and pre-clinical students, (p<0.001). Control group did not show improvement for pre-clinical students. Clinical students showed significant improvement in control group as well.

Conclusion: BLS can be safely and effectively taught to pre-clinical medical students in small groups by junior peer tutors having BLS training.

Keywords: Basic Life Support, Peer Tuition, Peer Assisted Learning, Undergraduate Medical Education.


Full Text:

XML PDF

References


Perkins GD, Jacobs IG, Nadkarni VM, Berg RA, Bhanji F, Biarent D, et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update of the Utstein Resuscitation Registry Templates for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: a statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation 2015;132(13):1286-300.

Grasner JT, Lefering R, Koster RW, Masterson S, Bottiger BW, Herlitz J, et al. EuReCa ONE-27 Nations, ONE Europe, ONE Registry: A prospective one month analysis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in 27 countries in Europe. Resuscitation. 2016;105:188-95.

Perkins, GD, Hulme, J, Bion, JF. Peer-led resuscitation training for healthcare students: a randomised controlled study. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(6):698-700.

Bucknall V, Sobic EM, Wood HL, Howlett SC, Taylor R, Perkins GD. Peer assessment of resuscitation skills. Resuscitation. 2008;77(2):211-5.

Topping KJ. The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. Higher Education. 1996;32(3):321-45.

Nestel D, Kidd J. Peer tutoring in patient-centered interviewing skills: experience of a project for first-year students. Med Teach. 2003;25(4):398-403.

Trevino FM, Eiland DC Jr. Evaluation of a basic science, peer tutorial program for first- and second-year medical students. J Med Educ. 1980;55(11):952-3.

Ebbert MR, Morgan PM, Harris IB. A comprehensive student peer-teaching program. Acad Med. 1999;74(5):583-4.

Fantuzzo JW, Dimeff LA, Fox SL. Reciprocal peer tutoring: a multimodal assessment of effectiveness with college students. Teaching of Psychology. 1989;16(3):133-5.

Escovitz ES. Using senior students as clinical skills teaching assistants. Acad Med. 1990;65(12):733-4.

Parr JM, Townsend MAR. Environments, processes, and mechanisms in peer learning. International Journal of Educational Research. 2002;37(5):403-23.

Secomb J. A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education. J Clin Nurs. 2008;17(6):703–16.

Clarke AJ, Burgess A, Menezes A, Mellis C. Senior students’ experience as tutors of their junior peers in the hospital setting. BMC Research Notes. 2015;8:743.

BLS Provider Manual 2015. Available from: https://www.onlineaha.org/system/scidea/learning_resources/268/original/2015_Interim_Resources_for_online_BLS_courses_12-18-15.pdf.

Hughes TC, Jiwaji Z, Lally K, et al. Advanced Cardiac Resuscitation Evaluation (ACRE): a randomized single-blind controlled trial of peer-led vs. expert-led advanced resuscitation training. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010;18:3-8.

Yu TC, Wilson NC, Singh PP, Lemanu DP, Hawken SJ, Hill AG. Medical students as teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2011;2:157-72.

Sternbach GL, Kiskaddon RT, Fossel M, Eliastam M. The retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 1984;2(1):33-6.

Smith KK, Gilcreast D, Pierce K. Evaluation of staff's retention of ACLS and BLS skills. Resuscitation. 2008;78(1):59-65.

Secomb J. A systematic review of peer teaching and learning in clinical education. JCN. 2008 Mar;17(6):703-16.

Mahling M, Münch A, Schenk S, Volkert S, Rein A, Teichner U, et al. Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study. BMC Medical Education. 2014;14(1):185-92.

Rezmer J, Begaz T, Treat R, Tews M. Impact of group size on the effectiveness of a resuscitation simulation curriculum for medical students. Teach Learn Med. 2011;23:251-5.

Manzoor I. Peer-assisted versus expert-assisted learning: a comparison of effectiveness in terms of academic scores. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014 Nov;24(11):825-9.

Breckwoldt J, Beetz D, Schnitzer L, Waskow C, Arntz HR, Weimann J. Medical students teaching basic life support to school children as a required element of medical education: a randomized controlled study comparing three different approaches to fifth year medical training in emergency medicine. Resuscitation. 2007;74(1):158-65.

Torgerson CJ. Educational research and randomized trials. Med Educ. 2002 Nov;36(11):1002-3.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.