Comparison of Tzanakis score and Alvarado score in acute appendicitis: a diagnostic accuracy study

Authors

  • Sania Tasbasum Federal Government Polyclinic (PGMI), Islamabad
  • Naveed Ullah Khan Federal Government Polyclinic (PGMI), Islamabad
  • Tayyaba Tabasum Umme Ilyas Hospital 
  • Mansoor Ahmad Khan Federal Government Polyclinic (PGMI), Islamabad
  • Hamza Anwer Federal Government Polyclinic (PGMI), Islamabad 
  • Maham Amir Federal Government Polyclinic (PGMI), Islamabad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52442/jrmi.v12i1.1016

Keywords:

Acute Appendicitis, Alvarado Score, Diagnostic Accuracy, Tzanakis Score

Abstract

Introduction: The diagnosis of Acute appendicitis (AA) remains challenging, leading to negative appendectomy rates of up to 30%. The Alvarado Score (AS) is widely used but has variable sensitivity and specificity. The Tzanakis Score (TZS) has shown potential to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Objective: To compare the diagnostic validity of AS and TZS using histopathology as the gold standard.

Materials and Methods: This prospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted in Department of General Surgery, Federal Government Polyclinic (PGMI), Islamabad Pakistan. A total of 100 patients, aged 13–55 years, with suspected acute appendicitis were enrolled. Patients were scored using AS (positive ≥7) and TZS (positive ≥8) before undergoing appendectomy. Histopathological findings were used as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, diagnostic accuracy, and likelihood ratios were calculated using SPSS v26.

Results: Among 100 patients, 60% were male and 40% female, with a mean weight of 62.5 ± 8.4 kg. Histopathology confirmed AA in 78% of cases. The AS showed 89.7% sensitivity, 54.5% specificity, 87.5% Positive Predictive Value (PPV), 60.0% Negative predictive value (NPV), and 82.0% accuracy [Positive Likelihood Ratio (PLR) 1.97, Negative Likelihood Ratio (NLR) 0.19]. The TZS demonstrated superior results with 96.2% sensitivity, 77.3% specificity, 93.8% PPV, 85.0% NPV, and 92.0% accuracy (PLR 4.24, NLR 0.05). Differences in sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy were statistically significant for TZS (p<0.05).

Conclusion: The Tzanakis Score provides higher diagnostic accuracy than the Alvarado Score and can be considered a more reliable tool for diagnosing acute appendicitis, potentially reducing negative appendectomy rates.

Author Biographies

Sania Tasbasum, Federal Government Polyclinic (PGMI), Islamabad

Postgraduate Resident, General Surgery

 

Naveed Ullah Khan, Federal Government Polyclinic (PGMI), Islamabad

Consultant Surgeon & Head Department of Surgery 

 

 

 

Tayyaba Tabasum, Umme Ilyas Hospital 

Consultant General Surgery 

 

 

Mansoor Ahmad Khan, Federal Government Polyclinic (PGMI), Islamabad

House Officer

 

 

Hamza Anwer, Federal Government Polyclinic (PGMI), Islamabad 

House Officer

 

Maham Amir, Federal Government Polyclinic (PGMI), Islamabad

House Officer

 

 

References

Mahmood FM, Garota SA. Comparison between modified Alvarado score and Tzanakis score in diagnosing acute appendicitis in Erbil City. Med J Babylon. 2018;15(3):210–3. Doi: 10.4103/MJBL.MJBL_47_18.

Khan ZA, Ateeq H, Shamim H, Zahid W, Majeed S, Saeed A, et al. Spectrum of postoperative complications and histopathological findings of appendectomy in Rehman Medical Institute from 2017-2018. J Rehman Med Inst. 2020 Jan-Mar;6(1):16-9. Doi: 10.52442/jrmi.v6i1.204.

Iqbal MZ, Ahmed MI, Malik NA, Kamran A, Qaiser MU, Riaz S. Comparison of Tzanakis and Alvarado Scoring System in Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis, with Histopathology as Gold Standard. J Rawalpindi Med Coll. 2022;26(2):290–4. Doi: 10.37939/jrmc.v26i2.1872.

Shams Ud Din S, Ullah Baig I, Tassawar Hussain M, Sadiq A, Humayun T, Ahmad U, Syed A. RIPASA versus Alvarado score in the assessment of acute appendicitis: a prospective study. Turk J Surg. 2023; 39: 231–6.

Doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.612.

Bouali M, El Berni Y, Moufakkir A, El Bakouri A, El Hattabi K, Bensardi F, Fadil A. Value of Alvarado scoring system in diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;77:103642. Doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103642.

Salahuddin F, Qureshi A. Diagnostic utility of RIPASA and modified Alvarado scoring system in acute appendicitis in Karachi, Pakistan. Pak J Surg. 2022;38(3):126–30.

Noor S, Wahab A, Afridi G, Kaleemullah. Comparing RIPASA score and Alvarado score in an accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020; 32(1): 38–41. http://www.jamc.ayubmed.edu.pk.

Awayshih MM, Nofal MN, Yousef AJ. Evaluation of Alvarado score in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;34:15. Doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.34.15.17803.

Tekeli MT, Ilhan E, Ureyen O, Senlikci A, Yeldan E, Ozturk M, et al. How much reliable is Alvarado scoring system in reducing negative appendectomy? Indian J Surg. 2016 Jan 11 ;79(2) :106–10. Doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1433-2.

10. Gonullu E, Bayhan Z, Capoglu R, Mantoglu B, Kamburoglu B, Harmantepe T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy rates of appendicitis scoring systems for the stratified age groups. Emerg Med Int. 2022;2022:2505977. Doi: 10.1155/2022/2505977.

Giljaca V, Nadarevic T, Poropat G, Nadarevic VS, Stimac D. Diagnostic accuracy of abdominal ultrasound for diagnosis of acute appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2017;41:693–700.

Doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3792-7.

Pifeleti S, Hansell D, Kaspar A. Sensitivity and specificity of the Alvarado Score for the timely differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis for a case series in Samoa. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;73:103219. Doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103219.

Flum DR, Koepsell T. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch Surg. 20022;137:799–804. Doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.7.799.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-17